Skip to content
selfcarta

What is the avoiding conflict style?

By Selfcarta Research Team. Last updated .

The avoiding conflict style means stepping away from a disagreement rather than dealing with it, whether by changing the subject, delaying or staying silent. People who lean on it tend to value calm and to pick their battles. It's a sensible choice when an issue is small or tempers are high, and it becomes costly when an important problem keeps getting put off.

In the usual model, avoiding reflects lower concern for your own goals and for the other person's in that moment. That can be misleading, though. Plenty of people avoid conflict because they care a lot and fear making things worse. It's rarely as indifferent as it looks.

What avoiding looks like in real life

You may lean this way if you tend to:

  • Say "it's fine" when it isn't quite fine.
  • Rehearse a difficult conversation for days, then not have it.
  • Go quiet, leave the room or get very busy when tension rises.
  • Change the subject with a joke when things get serious.
  • Send a message rather than talk in person, or put off sending anything at all.
  • Hope that a problem will sort itself out, and sometimes be right.

Not all of this is a problem. Letting a small thing go is a skill. So is saying, "I'm too wound up right now, let's talk tomorrow." The question is whether you come back to it.

How avoiding shows up

At work

You probably aren't the source of much drama. You stay out of office politics and let minor annoyances slide, which many colleagues appreciate. Stepping back can also buy time, or let someone else with more context deal with it.

The cost appears when something needs saying and nobody says it. Issues with a colleague, an unworkable deadline or an unfair workload can grow in the quiet. Your team may also not know you disagreed until you've quietly stopped caring. When it's hard to speak up in the moment, try putting it in writing, or bringing it to your manager with a suggestion attached. Our guide on how to ask for honest feedback offers some ways in.

In love

This is where avoidance can hurt most, even though it's often meant kindly. One partner raises a problem, the other withdraws, and that makes the first push harder, which makes the second withdraw further. Researchers call this demand and withdraw, and it's been studied a lot. It's often entwined with attachment: someone with avoidant attachment might step back from the emotional heat, while a partner with anxious attachment might push for contact.

A small fix can make a big difference. Don't just walk out. Say when you're coming back: "I can't do this well right now. Can we talk after dinner?" Then do it.

With friends

You may let things go for a very long time, and then one day, without warning, you quietly stop replying. From your side, it feels like avoiding a scene. From theirs, the friendship just ended, and they don't know why. Saying "that hurt a bit" when it's still small can save a friendship. Most friends would much rather know.

Strengths and watch-outs

The strengths are real: restraint, perspective and a talent for not turning everything into a crisis. You know that not every battle needs fighting. Avoiding is also a good choice if you don't feel safe. If someone frightens you, staying out of an argument is wise, and our safety page has more information.

The watch-outs are about what builds up. Some things that help:

  1. Sort your issues. Ask, "Will I still care about this in a month?" If yes, it deserves a conversation.
  2. Start small. Practise raising low-stakes things, like "I'd prefer not to meet on Fridays."
  3. Use a script. "When X happens, I feel Y. Could we try Z?" takes some of the fear out of it.
  4. Set a return time. A delay works best with a clear end.
  5. Write it down first. It's easier to speak when you've worked out what you think, and building emotional self-awareness makes that quicker.

How to work with someone who avoids a lot, or hardly ever

Someone who leans on avoiding

  • Raise things privately and give notice. An ambush makes people go quiet.
  • Keep your voice calm, and stick to one topic at a time.
  • Ask them to reply in writing if talking on the spot is hard.
  • Don't take silence as agreement, and don't take it as not caring.
  • Thank them when they do raise something. It may have taken real effort.

Someone who rarely avoids

  • They may want to sort things out right now. Tell them when you need time, and when you'll be ready.
  • Don't assume they're attacking you because they've raised an issue. They may just want it done.
  • Try saying one thing sooner than feels comfortable. They'll probably welcome it.

If you're paired with someone who tends to compete, this gets harder. It's often better to agree on how you'll disagree before you actually need to.

Research notes

  • Demand and withdraw. Schrodt, Witt and Shimkowski's (2014) meta-analysis of 74 studies, with over 14,000 participants, found that this pattern is moderately linked to how individuals and relationships fare, and more so for relational and communication outcomes. Couples in these patterns tend to report poorer outcomes, though this kind of evidence can't show what causes what.
  • It's hard to see from outside. De Dreu and colleagues (2001) found that, in a negotiation study, self-reports, the other party's reports and observer ratings lined up for problem solving, forcing and yielding, but not for avoiding. That may be because avoiding is partly about what doesn't happen. Your own idea of how much you avoid may differ from how others see it, which is a good reason to ask people who know you.
  • How it's perceived. In Gross and Guerrero's (2000) simulated work task, avoiding was generally seen as ineffective and inappropriate. That's a single study of work decisions among students, not a general rule.
  • Passive handling. DeChurch and Marks (2001) found that task conflict went with poorer group performance when it was managed passively, and with better performance when actively managed.
  • Personality links. Tehrani and Yamini's (2020) meta-analysis linked avoiding with higher neuroticism and higher agreeableness. That fits with the idea that many avoiders want to protect the peace or worry about what might happen, rather than not caring. If it resonates, read about emotional stability too.

Understand your pattern

If you've ever said "it's fine" through your teeth, you're in good company. Take the Conflict Style Expedition to see how you score across all five styles. It takes about four minutes and uses Selfcarta's own questions, which haven't yet been independently validated. Then you can decide which conversation you'd like to have next, and when.

Sources

  1. Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., & Shimkowski, J. R. (2014). A meta-analytical review of the demand/withdraw pattern of interaction and its associations with individual, relational, and communicative outcomes. Communication Monographs, 81(1).
  2. Gross, M. A., & Guerrero, L. K. (2000). Managing conflict appropriately and effectively: An application of the competence model to Rahim's organizational conflict styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(3).
  3. De Dreu, C. K. W., Evers, A., Beersma, B., Kluwer, E. S., & Nauta, A. (2001). A theory-based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(6).
  4. DeChurch, L. A., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Maximizing the benefits of task conflict: The role of conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(1).
  5. Tehrani, H. D., & Yamini, S. (2020). Personality traits and conflict resolution styles: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 157.